Ooh, does ooh need a hug?

Go on. Click the picture. Go ahead. I'll wait. Read the laundry list of whining and bitching by one Michael Minelli, who was referred to as "Douche Nine" in the book "Hot Chicks with Douchebags". His feelings were SO hurt, that he's suing the author and the publisher of the book. The picture is an excerpt from the lawsuit.

Poor baby. Someone called him a douchebag. And instead of handling the situation with grace, laughing it off, playing off it, and probably making himself into the biggest player of all time (everyone knows chicks LOVE assholes), he's whining about it. Publically.

I cannot wait to see how this one plays out.

I present to you: A tattooed douchebag (Part II)

I have no words.

See Part I

To publish or not to publish

Update:The dude lives in Ozark, Missouri. Chances are he lives in his mom's basement because she continues to be her love toy. Which explains his anger towards women.

Beware visitor tracking software, dude. We can find you anywhere.

A while back I posted some old ads which portrayed women poorly. I mean, it was one of my first posts, and back then, I was figuring no one was really reading my blog. Honestly, back then, no one was. Don't get me wrong, not too many people faithfully read it now, except for an awesome few whom I greatly appreciate and lurve, but the majority of traffic that I get goes to a page I entitled "sexy ass math tattoo" because people google sexy ass and get me instead.

One of the issues I've struggled with since starting this blog is whether or not I should publish comments that offend me or piss me off. There've been a couple I wouldn't publish because they were just so ridiculously off point there was no reason to publish them. But then, this morning, I got a message in my in-box about this message from Obbop on that post to which I previously alluded.

Obbop said...

Just one more bit of proof of the need for the Females as Property Movement (tm) to be adopted nation-, society- and culturally-wide.

The vacuous females need to be protected from themselves along with society needing protection from females.

The dainty darlings do not have the required traits to be full-fledged members of adult society. Oh, sure, there are a very few exceptions and those very few capable females will be allowed full adult societal rights.

For the majority of other females, they will be happier if not forced to attempt to be what they are incapable of being; rational logical adults with all the rights, priveleges AND responsibilities of being a full-fledged adult.

Now, these statements made my ass twitch, quite honestly. And should someone in life had said this to my face, I probably would have ranted at them for a good twenty minutes before feeling better. So why publish?

Well, I have a couple different theories. 1) it's a woman writing with complete irony; 2) it's a troll trying to get a rise out of me; or 3) this douche bag really believes what he's saying. Honestly, I'm pretty sure it's number 3, although upon further review, I'm starting to see much evidence for number 2. On his blog, to which he linked (evidence in my view to #3), he calls himself a pundit, which is defined as someone who offers mass-media opinion, analysis or commentary on a particular subject area. (evidence in my view to #2). Furthermore, he has a poll on there as well: Do you answer blog polls? And wouldn't you know, 75% of the people who answered said no. (evidence to #2 or #1).

Either way, why not publish his bullshit? Do I agree with his statements? Absolutely not. Do I agree that he should be allowed to believe whatever the hell he wants? Dude, if he wants to be stupid, by all means.

If it is a troll: dude, you need to find a better use for your time and talents.

If it is a woman: very Twainish, if not cliched.

If it is a douche bag: this is why you live in your mother's basement.

Holy moly

Cheastypants found this sound clip via It's All About the Blog, who found it via Holy Taco.

Here's the deal. Men, you know how when you get a lady's number, you like to wait a little while to call it so that she doesn't think you're a desperate loser? Well, rest assured that so long as you don't do what this guy does, you're less close to being a desperate loser than you thought.

Here's the back story according to Cheasty (according to It's All About the blog [according to Holy Taco]):

The back story on this is that a girl named Olga was out with her friends in the Marina district of San Francisco and she talked to this guy named Dmitri for all of two minutes. Then she gave him her card and said “give me a call.” The following are the messages he left. Listen to the whole thing, it just keeps getting better and better.


http://view.break.com/527579 - Watch more free videos

I present to you: a tattooed douche bag.

Here's the front of the douche bag (I did not put that caption in there)


And...here's the back, equally douche baggy as the front.

Dude, I hate to tell you this, but tribal tattoos, getting "Pig" tattooed on your chest and "Manimal" tattooed on your back...all elements of a douche bag.

A little compassion, please

Consumerist.com is one of my very favorite websites ever. I have learned more there than probably from all my classes put together my first semester in college. A recent article published on the website paralleled my situation a couple years ago, but one of the comments to the article hit such douche bag proportions, that I'm kind of left at a loss for words.

This woman who was recently out of college had a difficult time getting a steady job. I can relate - the job market is tough. She had her student loans through Sally Mae - a private lending firm. After she graduated, they wanted her to make $400 a month payments, which, honestly, is outrageous for someone right out of college. They've threatened to garnish her wages, and frightened her so badly, that she's changed her phone number so they couldn't contact her. Now that she's gotten a steady job, and has had to it four months, and is ready to start making payments on her student loan - just not $400 a month - she wants to speak with them about arranging income-based payments, but is afraid to contact them for fear that they'll either make her pay the full amount per month, or garnish her wages.

This is the comment that got posted:

"Why do we place such an incredibly large financial burden on those who are going to significantly help the economy"

Apparently not so much in her case, since she can't even get a decent job. Lenders ought to ask about the student's major before lending the money.

by jimv2000.

How does he know what her situation is. And lenders ought to ask majors before lending? So, what, no loans for liberal arts majors? How does he know she's not pre-law?

Anyway, if you'd like to email him to bring to light his immense douche baggery, he can be reached at commenting+370892.4815955@consumerist.com.